GIFs' Lost Coolness: Reflecting on Digital Ageing Online

I dismissed the discomfort of my troublesome knee and the encroaching gray hue in my beard. However, in the face of my beloved animated graphics losing their fashionable status, I can't help but ponder if this extends to my own relevancy.

Without indulging in self-aggrandizement, I possess a distinct proficiency in the creation of GIFs. These are not the pre-fabricated variety; my repertoire doesn't include the ubiquitous "man-blinking-in-polite-disbelief," "woman-in-a-turquoise-top-doing-a-spit-take," or the classic Ron Burgundy exclamation: "That escalated quickly." Rather, my specialization lies in crafting tailored and bespoke GIFs, meticulously chosen for each unique context. Occasionally, I even curate my own GIFs, extracting memorable lines or wry facial expressions from television shows and reserving them for specific occasions. For instance, the inclusion of Super Hans from Peep Show uttering, "The secret ingredient is crime," serves as an exemplar. While it may lack the versatility of a generic GIF, akin to Homer Simpson's retreat into a hedge, its selective utilization renders it all the more impactful.

However, a singular quandary emerges in this context, and if you belong to the Generation Y cohort or a younger demographic, you're likely already engaged in producing a TikTok video to elucidate it for me: GIFs have fallen out of favor. The realm of GIF usage has now been embraced by middle-aged individuals. Platforms such as Twitter and WhatsApp have incorporated GIF search functionalities that aid even those with limited technological affinity in locating animations like a young girl energized by sugar at a baseball game or Steve Carell's forceful exclamation of "No!" GIFs, due to their universal appeal, have consequently lost their cachet. As Natasha Lyonne expresses in a GIF from a television series I haven't yet viewed, these dynamics are beyond my control. I harbor the wish that I possessed such authority.

While grappling with a tender knee and the emergence of greying in my beard, this marks the inaugural instance when I've truly sensed the weight of age. I've achieved mastery in a skill that has become wholly outmoded, akin to the roles of a knocker-upper or a leech collector. While my array of professional opportunities far exceeds those of a 19th-century textile laborer, the sentiment is far from uplifting. Is this the trajectory that life has charted henceforth? My journey entails grappling with new technology only to discern its redundancy shortly after?

My decision is now irrevocable. Notably, author and polemicist Nassim Taleb introduces the Lindy Effect into discourse, proposing that the enduring nature of nonperishable elements – encompassing technology and concepts – correlates directly with their extended sustainability. By this reasoning, a book that has sustained its presence for four decades possesses a higher likelihood of persisting for another four, in contrast to a fleeting bestseller that emerged merely a week prior. Henceforth, I am resolved to immerse myself exclusively in skills that remain impervious to technological emulation for centuries, such as the culinary arts over an open fire or the craft of papier-mâché. The era of GIFs may have reached its closure, yet the potential revival of cave painting lies untapped.

Source

Rise of AI tech jobs and lucrative salaries

The AI technology sector is experiencing an increase in employment prospects, coupled with generous salary packages.

The burgeoning AI expansion is permeating the employment sphere, with commensurate compensation for those who secure such positions.

Netflix recently announced an opportunity that presented a compensation potential of up to $900,000, aiming to engage individuals with extensive proficiency in managing machine learning platforms. (Although the initial posting seemingly withdrew due to heightened exposure, a comparable opening with a similarly substantial salary bracket is still discernible upon conducting a targeted AI inquiry.)

This is not the sole instance of a well-compensated role within the field of generative AI. Nvidia has open positions that offer remuneration within the vicinity of $400,000. Likewise, organizations such as Meta, Microsoft, and Alphabet's Google have advertised opportunities boasting substantial salaries.

According to Vasant Dhar, a distinguished Professor at NYU, artificial intelligence has assumed the role akin to Wall Street in contemporary times. Dhar emphasizes that the significant financial gains are now being generated by major technology companies, effectively positioning them as the modern money-making engines. He underscores the pivotal role of intelligence in this context, asserting that the future landscape is unequivocally centered around intelligence. Dhar also points out the scarcity of exceptionally skilled individuals to meet the demand.

As the tally of six-figure positions continues to mount, the narrative surrounding AI's potential as a job eliminator may require reconsideration, especially within specific domains that demand specialized skills.

While Netflix engages in the recruitment of AI professionals commanding almost a million dollars in remuneration, its writing staff remains embroiled in a strike, partly driven by concerns associated with generative AI.

Vasant Dhar delves into the intricacies of the situation, emphasizing the pronounced variability in capabilities inherent within the landscape. Dhar elucidates that while certain individuals undoubtedly possess an innate capacity to yield exceptional outcomes, their worth surpassing monetary boundaries, others may fall short of this mark. The central query revolves around the ability to effectively decipher and differentiate between these disparate levels of aptitude.

When AI doesn't serve as the foundational element of a company's core operations, the challenge of differentiation intensifies, and its significance amplifies. This situation particularly favors entities already entrenched in the AI domain, such as Google, Nvidia, and Microsoft, bestowing them with a competitive advantage.

Career Sector Disruption

Amid the emergence of these newly remunerative positions, the rise of AI is concurrently leading to the displacement of existing roles. A recent research study titled "Generative AI in Enterprise" conducted by Technalysis Research reveals that 10% of surveyed companies have instituted AI to supplant human roles. The study further demonstrates that an additional 36% of organizations anticipate an impending influence of AI on their workforce composition.

As Bob O'Donnell, the President of Technalysis and the analytical mind responsible for the study, aptly articulates, the trajectory of significant technological advancements inevitably ushers in workplace alterations. This evolution often culminates in the realignment of roles, a pattern that has been recurrent with previous transformative breakthroughs.

What prompts the considerable concern among individuals regarding the labor market repercussions of AI?

According to O'Donnell, the salient divergence at present lies in the identity of the affected parties.

"In retrospect, such shifts have occurred previously, primarily affecting blue-collar roles. However, the current concern is amplified due to the prospect of white-collar positions being impacted as well," he remarked.

Human versus Artificial Intelligence

The influence of AI on the employment sector is contingent upon its level of proficiency. The preliminary developmental roles found within firms such as Netflix and Nvidia are less likely to substantially alter the employment dynamics, save for a fortunate few.

Researchers in the field of artificial intelligence at Arthur conducted a Hallucination Experiment to evaluate the proficiency of generative AI in responding to a diverse array of queries encompassing topics like mathematical facts, U.S. presidents, and Moroccan political figures.

Multiple occurrences were observed in which the AI bots exhibited a regression into hallucinatory responses, characterized by instances where generative artificial intelligence disseminated inaccurate information. Among the tested models, GPT-4 demonstrated the lowest performance when confronted with questions about U.S. presidents; conversely, it excelled in solving mathematical problems. Anthropic's Claude 2 exhibited the highest proficiency in responding to inquiries regarding U.S. presidents. Meanwhile, Meta's Llama 2 displayed an overall need for refinement; the research team noted a higher incidence of hallucinatory outputs in its large language model when compared to GPT and Claude 2.

In the ongoing struggle between human ingenuity and machine capabilities, the current state of affairs indicates that generative AI possesses inherent imperfections, which in turn, to a certain extent, acts as a moderating force in the trajectory of transformative shifts.

Source

Job Vacancies at OpenAI: Requisite Skill Set

• Jan Leike, overseeing the discipline of superalignment at OpenAI, has conveyed his intention to expand his team's workforce during an interview with "The 80,000 Hours Podcast."
• Jan Leike has initiated a recruitment campaign targeting research engineers, scientists, and managerial candidates. These positions offer a competitive annual compensation range of $245,000 to $500,000.
• While a doctoral degree is not mandatory, candidates are expected to exhibit proficiency in coding and possess strong critical thinking abilities.

If you are considering a career at OpenAI, the innovative firm behind ChatGPT, a prominent executive from the organization has outlined the specific skill sets he seeks in potential recruits.

In a recent podcast episode, Jan Leike, the leader of OpenAI's superalignment division, which focuses on ensuring alignment between the company's AI systems and human interests, announced that his team is actively seeking candidates for various research-oriented roles.

In a recent installment of "The 80,000 Hours Podcast," Jan Leike, Head of Superalignment at OpenAI, highlighted the company's current focus on recruiting individuals for key research roles such as research engineers, research scientists, and research managers. Leike anticipates a significant recruitment drive, estimating at least 10 new hires before the year's end, with the potential for even greater expansion in the coming years.

According to Leike, highly qualified candidates possess proficiency in coding, a deep comprehension of machine learning principles, and robust critical thinking skills. Additionally, Leike underscored the importance of a genuine commitment to enhancing AI safety, emphasizing that such attributes are integral to becoming a strong contender for the positions.

In the superalignment division of OpenAI, research engineers shoulder the responsibility of formulating and executing experimental initiatives within the domain of safety research. OpenAI's employment listing cites potential annual remuneration ranging from $245,000 to $450,000. The role encompasses tasks such as coding for machine learning training, overseeing datasets central to experimentation, and addressing software glitches.

According to Leike, possessing experience in AI safety or a PhD in machine learning is not a requisite for the job, as these qualifications are considered the 'traditional path' into the field. Instead, Leike highlighted that his team's primary emphasis lies in identifying candidates well-versed in the creation of machine learning models.

Collaborating closely with research engineers, research scientists play a pivotal role in advancing OpenAI's alignment research objectives. These professionals, who have the potential to earn up to $450,000 annually, bear the responsibility of ideating solutions for challenges and overseeing the strategic design of research.

According to Leike, the roles of research engineers and scientists both demand a significant degree of critical thinking, the ability to pose pertinent inquiries, and an innate curiosity regarding the realm of technology we are constructing.

Within the organizational structure, the role of research manager involves supervising the activities of both research engineers and research scientists. With an annual compensation ranging from $420,000 to $500,000, the research manager assumes the responsibility of steering the team's strategic trajectory.

In seeking the perfect fit for this leadership position, Leike underscored the importance of a harmonious blend of management acumen and adept machine learning skills. The sought-after individuals span a spectrum of profiles, from those with experience guiding research teams in machine learning companies to managers with contributions to extensive language model projects, and even postdoctoral researchers who have led compact research groups.

"A manager must possess a genuine commitment to the challenges we aim to address, coupled with a high level of proficiency in coding and machine learning," emphasized Leike.

According to Leike, his team is dedicated to confronting 'one of the pivotal challenges' due to the potential hazards the technology could entail for the human race. A potential candidate who shares this viewpoint, he suggested, would be a suitable match for OpenAI.

Leike expressed, "If you are inclined towards joining a team of exceptionally driven and skilled individuals, who are sincerely dedicated to addressing formidable challenges with substantial resources at their disposal, then this is the opportune destination," he stated.

OpenAI's hiring endeavors extend beyond the superalignment team. With a current workforce of 1,715 employees, as indicated on its LinkedIn profile, the organization presently boasts 59 vacant positions as of August 8th. These openings encompass roles such as an account executive, a customer success manager for the "Go To Market" team, and leadership positions within the public policy department.

Insider's request for comment from OpenAI remained unanswered as of the publication.

Source

Anthropic's Strategic Investment in Chatbot Space

The landscape of generative artificial intelligence (AI) platforms is poised for substantial transformation, underscored by the widespread acclaim garnered by OpenAI's ChatGPT. Remarkably, within two months, this AI platform amassed a staggering 100 million monthly active users, establishing itself as the fastest-growing consumer platform in history by January. However, its reign was short-lived, as Meta Platforms Inc.'s latest microblogging platform, Threads, swiftly overtook its status. Nevertheless, the domain has witnessed a surge of popularity, evident in the emergence of numerous recent unicorns within this sector. Notably, even retail investors have ventured into this arena, exemplified by ventures such as RAD AI securing multimillion-dollar investments from both retail and accredited investors.

Engaged in a Struggle for Supremacy

In the wake of ChatGPT's rapid surge to prominence, notable tech giants including Microsoft Corp. and Alphabet Inc.'s Google expedited their efforts to introduce their respective generative AI solutions, capitalizing on the prevailing momentum. While both platforms were swiftly introduced following ChatGPT's sensational ascent, they faced limitations in replicating the exceptional buzz engendered by OpenAI's pioneering AI creation.

Significant Engagement:

• Prominent individuals with substantial wealth are increasingly generating their fortunes within the confines of private markets. Presently, a nascent startup is orchestrating a transformative shift in healthcare investment, enabling broader participation for individuals.
• Enthusiasts in the gaming realm are securing substantial returns by divesting their used gaming assets for significant sums. Explore the motivations driving both ordinary gamers and astute investors to participate in their auxiliary pursuits, as well as their collective investment of more than $1.2 million in this burgeoning startup.

Anthropic, a comparatively lesser-recognized startup, is strategically allocating substantial investments toward the establishment of a competitive AI platform. Within a brief span following the achievement of securing $750 million across two financing rounds, the startup is poised to unveil its latest AI chatbot, Claude 2. Notably, Anthropic had previously secured $450 million in May, building upon the momentum of a preceding $300 million financing round in March, culminating in an impressive company valuation of $4.1 billion.

Established in 2021 by a cohort of former high-ranking personnel from OpenAI and fortified by substantial backing from notable conglomerates such as Google, Salesforce Inc., and Zoom, Anthropic is currently poised to broaden the reach of its chatbot technology with the introduction of Claude 2 for public accessibility. Over the course of the preceding two months, the organization's AI models have undergone comprehensive evaluation in real-world scenarios, collaborating with a range of enterprises encompassing Slack, Notion, and Quora.

Consequently, Anthropic has effectively curated an extensive queue comprising more than 350,000 individuals eagerly anticipating access to Claude's application programming interface (API) and its array of consumer-centric attributes. In its initial phase, Claude's deployment is strategically earmarked for the markets of the United States and the United Kingdom, with Anthropic's roadmap outlining an ambitious expansion strategy for the subsequent months.

"With a strategic emphasis on enterprises, our concerted efforts have revolved around augmenting Claude's resilience to the highest standards of safety," remarked Daniela Amodei, Co-Founder of Anthropic. "Our conviction resonates strongly in deeming this iteration of Claude to be the most secure rendition we have crafted thus far. The palpable enthusiasm stems from our earnest anticipation of introducing it to a broader spectrum encompassing businesses and discerning individual consumers."

Claude AI: Spearheading Evolution in Generative AI

Daniela Amodei, with resolute dedication, has invested no less than two months in steering the evolution of Claude 2. This process has been facilitated by a committed cohort of 30 to 35 professionals who have been directly engaged in refining the AI model, complemented by an additional workforce of 150 employees offering comprehensive support.

Claude 2 exhibits the capability to succinctly encapsulate the essence of content spanning a scope of approximately 75,000 words, equating to the extent of a standard book. In stark juxtaposition, ChatGPT is proficient in managing content within the range of approximately 3,000 words. Furthermore, users are empowered to input comprehensive data sets and solicit summarizations in diverse formats.

Amodei supplemented her discourse with tangible exemplifications of Claude 2's strides, juxtaposed against its antecedent iteration. The latest rendition of the chatbot exhibited an impressive score of 76.5% in the bar exam's multiple-choice segment, signifying a notable elevation of 3.5 percentage points compared to the preceding score of 73%. Concurrently, Claude 2 attained a commendable score of 71% in a Python coding evaluation, underlining substantial advancement from the prior version's score of 56%.

An eminent enhancement inherent in Anthropic, when juxtaposed with ChatGPT, is its heightened capacity to provide "innocuous responses," demonstrating a twofold increase in effectiveness in comparison to the latter.

"In the realm of business dynamics, the prevailing juncture is indeed unique, marked by an exceptional upswing in the requisition for comprehensive language models. The demand for these models presently outpaces the industry's existing provisioning," elucidated Amodei. "The landscape is remarkably extensive, with ample latitude for a myriad of users, catering to diverse profiles, to effectively leverage these sophisticated systems."

Prospects on the Horizon

Anthropic was one of the four entities summoned to a high-level assembly at the White House in May, wherein it actively participated in deliberations pertaining to conscientious AI advancement, under the aegis of Vice President Kamala Harris. Additional entities extended invitations to this meeting included Alphabet, Microsoft Corp., and OpenAI.

An overarching apprehension involves the matter of AI chatbots generating inaccurate responses, frequently characterized as 'hallucinations' within the tech industry—a persistent challenge that continues to demand attention. Moreover, noteworthy AI enterprises are collaborating to advocate for the necessity of comprehensive AI regulations, accentuating the potential adverse implications of unchecked expansion in the realm of generative artificial intelligence.

"A multitude of uncharted variables persists, accompanied by recognized obstacles inherent in every existing language model across the global landscape," Amodei elucidated. "Achieving absolute immunity from 'hallucinations' remains elusive, a characteristic common to all language models without exception, including Claude 2."

Source